]> code.ossystems Code Review - openembedded-core.git/commit
rpm 5.4.0: respect to the arch when choose the alternatives
authorRobert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Wed, 23 May 2012 05:55:39 +0000 (13:55 +0800)
committerScott Garman <sgarman@zenlinux.com>
Fri, 1 Jun 2012 16:27:42 +0000 (09:27 -0700)
commit2199e6b9c82bb2b6738e87903f30329586db20e2
tree500ce41c863c3ef459f5159c65b80c45120549f8
parentd7bf94647f17c0382caad8af0bdda837b14b22dc
rpm 5.4.0: respect to the arch when choose the alternatives

There is a bug if we:
1) bitbake diffutils with MACHINE=crownbay
2) bitbake diffutils with MACHINE=qemux86
3) bitbake core-image-sato with MACHINE=crownbay

Then the diffutils.i586 would be installed to the crownbay's image, this
is because diffutils.i586 is newer than diffutils.core2, and rpm doesn't
respect to the arch priorities:

We have put the archs in order in _solve_dbpath:

crownbay/solvedb:core2/solvedb:i586/solvedb:all/solvedb

Fix rpm to respect to the order, for example, if it finds a pkg in both
core2/ and i586/, and the core2/ comes first, it should not use the one
in i586/ even if it's build time is newer.

Note: Don't worry about the _free(*ptr), it can check whether ptr is
NULL or not.

This is for the denzil branch, and the master branch also needs it.

[YOCTO #2360]

Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-respect-arch.patch [new file with mode: 0644]
meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb