package.bbclass: enable the use of package_qa_handle_error

This will allow the reporting of these errors as either WARNINGs (default)
or ERRORs if installed_vs_shipped is added to the ERROR_QA of the policy
file (such as a <distro_name>.conf file.

V2: found the code I had intended to send instead of that other junk,
    was just not watching what I pushed on that one, sorry. (this is edit in
    no in the actual commit message)

Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>

diff --git a/meta/classes/package.bbclass b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
index d94d32f72ab0aaaaab22e64a21743436cd40ced5..e6856cdf87ba0c37e9c64b8b0b5c7bb60171cff1 100644 (file)
--- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
@@ -988,9 +988,13 @@ python populate_packages () {
                                unshipped.append(path)
 
        if unshipped != []:
-               bb.warn("For recipe %s, the following files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package:" % pn)
-               for f in unshipped:
-                       bb.warn("  " + f)
+               msg = pn + ": Files/directories were installed but not shipped"
+               if "installed_vs_shipped" in (d.getVar('INSANE_SKIP_' + pn, True) or "").split():
+                       bb.note("Package %s skipping QA tests: installed_vs_shipped" % pn)
+               else:
+                       for f in unshipped:
+                               msg = msg + "\n  " + f  
+                       package_qa_handle_error("installed_vs_shipped", msg, d)
 
        bb.build.exec_func("package_name_hook", d)