Newer versions of patch, such as in Fedora 14, don't like ".." within
the middle of the file to be patched path.
In order to fix the issue we have to hand apply the patch instead of using
the normal mechanisms. Only flaw with the os.system(...) approach is if it
fails we don't get any notification or a resolver failure.
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
---- db-5.1.19/../src/dbinc/mutex_int.h.orig 2011-01-05 19:21:42.181805366 -0600
-+++ db-5.1.19/../src/dbinc/mutex_int.h 2011-01-05 19:24:53.141853117 -0600
+--- db-5.1.19/src/dbinc/mutex_int.h.orig 2011-01-05 19:21:42.181805366 -0600
++++ db-5.1.19/src/dbinc/mutex_int.h 2011-01-05 19:24:53.141853117 -0600
@@ -474,6 +474,25 @@
#ifdef LOAD_ACTUAL_MUTEX_CODE
LICENSE = "BSD Sleepycat"
VIRTUAL_NAME ?= "virtual/db"
CONFLICTS = "db3"
-PR = "r1"
+PR = "r2"
SRC_URI = "http://download.oracle.com/berkeley-db/db-${PV}.tar.gz"
-#SRC_URI_MD5 = "http://downloads.sleepycat.com/db-${PV}.tar.gz.md5"
-SRC_URI += "file://arm-thumb-mutex_db5.patch;patch=1"
+SRC_URI += "file://arm-thumb-mutex_db5.patch;apply=no"
SRC_URI[md5sum] = "76fcbfeebfcd09ba0b4d96bfdf8d884d"
SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "0194d4ca9266ba1a1c0bfbc233b18bfd05f63163453c81ebcdfdc7112d5ac850"
oe_runconf
}
+do_patch_append() {
+ os.system("cd ${S}/.. ; patch -p1 -i ${WORKDIR}/arm-thumb-mutex_db5.patch")
+}
+
do_install_append() {
mkdir -p ${D}/${includedir}/db51
#mv ${D}/${includedir}/db_185.h ${D}/${includedir}/db51/.