bb.debug(1, "Skipping recipe %s because of incompatible license(s): %s" % (pn, ' '.join(incompatible_lic)))
raise bb.parse.SkipRecipe("it has incompatible license(s): %s" % ' '.join(incompatible_lic))
- # Try to verify per-package (LICENSE_<pkg>) values. LICENSE should be a
- # superset of all per-package licenses. We do not do advanced (pattern)
- # matching of license expressions - just check that all license strings
- # in LICENSE_<pkg> are found in LICENSE.
- license_set = oe.license.list_licenses(license)
- for pkg in d.getVar('PACKAGES').split():
- pkg_license = d.getVar('LICENSE_' + pkg)
- if pkg_license:
- unlisted = oe.license.list_licenses(pkg_license) - license_set
- if unlisted:
- bb.warn("LICENSE_%s includes licenses (%s) that are not "
- "listed in LICENSE" % (pkg, ' '.join(unlisted)))
-
needsrcrev = False
srcuri = d.getVar('SRC_URI')
for uri in srcuri.split():
textrel incompatible-license files-invalid \
infodir build-deps src-uri-bad symlink-to-sysroot multilib \
invalid-packageconfig host-user-contaminated uppercase-pn patch-fuzz \
- mime mime-xdg \
+ mime mime-xdg unlisted-pkg-lics \
"
ERROR_QA ?= "dev-so debug-deps dev-deps debug-files arch pkgconfig la \
perms dep-cmp pkgvarcheck perm-config perm-line perm-link \
sane = False
return sane
+QAPKGTEST[unlisted-pkg-lics] = "package_qa_check_unlisted_pkg_lics"
+def package_qa_check_unlisted_pkg_lics(package, d, messages):
+ """
+ Check that all licenses for a package are among the licenses for the recipe.
+ """
+ pkg_lics = d.getVar('LICENSE_' + package)
+ if not pkg_lics:
+ return True
+
+ recipe_lics_set = oe.license.list_licenses(d.getVar('LICENSE'))
+ unlisted = oe.license.list_licenses(pkg_lics) - recipe_lics_set
+ if not unlisted:
+ return True
+
+ package_qa_add_message(messages, "unlisted-pkg-lics",
+ "LICENSE_%s includes licenses (%s) that are not "
+ "listed in LICENSE" % (package, ' '.join(unlisted)))
+ return False
+
def package_qa_check_encoding(keys, encode, d):
def check_encoding(key, enc):
sane = True