cve-check: ensure all known CVEs are in the report

CVEs that are whitelisted or were not vulnerable when there are version
comparisons were not included in the report, so alter the logic to ensure that
all relevant CVEs are in the report for completeness.

(From OE-Core rev: 98256ff05fcfe9d5ccad360582c36eafb577c264)

Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>

diff --git a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
index c00d2910be1c1cc515fa529bdd67d69f1a8869d5..f87bcc9dc611f1f5160797efa0495d4924339dfd 100644 (file)
--- a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
@@ -208,12 +208,14 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves):
 
             if cve in cve_whitelist:
                 bb.note("%s-%s has been whitelisted for %s" % (product, pv, cve))
+                # TODO: this should be in the report as 'whitelisted'
+                patched_cves.add(cve)
             elif cve in patched_cves:
                 bb.note("%s has been patched" % (cve))
             else:
                 to_append = False
                 if (operator_start == '=' and pv == version_start):
-                    cves_unpatched.append(cve)
+                    to_append = True
                 else:
                     if operator_start:
                         try:
@@ -243,8 +245,11 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves):
                         to_append = to_append_start or to_append_end
 
                 if to_append:
+                    bb.note("%s-%s is vulnerable to %s" % (product, pv, cve))
                     cves_unpatched.append(cve)
-                bb.debug(2, "%s-%s is not patched for %s" % (product, pv, cve))
+                else:
+                    bb.note("%s-%s is not vulnerable to %s" % (product, pv, cve))
+                    patched_cves.add(cve)
     conn.close()
 
     return (list(patched_cves), cves_unpatched)