When numa is not supported, there is no reason to run the ptests since
they will fail. While the best scenario would be for the upstream tests
to skip themselves when numa is not supported, for now skip them in
run-ptest.
Signed-off-by: Randy Witt <randy.e.witt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
#!/bin/sh
-make regress1
-make regress2
-if numademo -t -e 10M; then
- echo "PASS: numademo"
+
+# If there is numa support, run the tests. Otherwise skip all the tests.
+# Ideally the skipping would happen by the upstream tests.
+if ! numactl -s | grep -q "No NUMA support available on this system."; then
+ make regress1
+ make regress2
+ if numademo -t -e 10M; then
+ echo "PASS: numademo"
+ else
+ echo "FAIL: numademo"
+ fi
else
- echo "FAIL: numademo"
+ echo "SKIP: ./../test/bind_range"
+ echo "SKIP: ./../test/checkaffinity"
+ echo "SKIP: ./../test/checktopology"
+ echo "SKIP: ./../test/distance"
+ echo "SKIP: ./../test/nodemap"
+ echo "SKIP: ./../test/tbitmap"
+ echo "SKIP: numactl_regress"
+ echo "SKIP: numademo"
fi