The PyPI license classifiers include "OSI Approved: BSD", which does not
specify which of the many variations of BSD license it actually means.
The generic "BSD" license in the oe-core set is actually BSD-3-Clause.
>From a random sample of ten PyPI modules that use "BSD", they are all
BSD-3-Clause. As we expect the recipe maintainer to verify the license
anyway, and this matches the previous license text, explicitly set the
license to BSD-3-Clause.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
'License :: OSI Approved :: Apple Public Source License': 'APSL',
'License :: OSI Approved :: Artistic License': 'Artistic',
'License :: OSI Approved :: Attribution Assurance License': 'AAL',
- 'License :: OSI Approved :: BSD License': 'BSD',
+ 'License :: OSI Approved :: BSD License': 'BSD-3-Clause',
'License :: OSI Approved :: Common Public License': 'CPL',
'License :: OSI Approved :: Eiffel Forum License': 'EFL',
'License :: OSI Approved :: European Union Public Licence 1.0 (EUPL 1.0)': 'EUPL-1.0',