From: Mark Hatle Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 19:03:52 +0000 (-0600) Subject: security_flags.inc: Special flags are needed for RPM X-Git-Tag: 2016-4~524 X-Git-Url: https://code.ossystems.io/gitweb?a=commitdiff_plain;h=98b5f1ef188965f0116ebbe00be746dceb96936e;p=openembedded-core.git security_flags.inc: Special flags are needed for RPM RPM interally has support to build and work with the stack protector. This is disabled by default in the RPM package, and the proper settings should be specified in the security_flags. Using the default setting of stack-protector-strong causes linking problems due to issues with libtool selecting the wrong GCC objections to link against. Falling back to the RPM values of stack-protector will permit linking to work properly, and some level of protection. Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle --- diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc index ed82087693..ff5f34e3a3 100644 --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-python-pycurl = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-python-smartpm = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-python-numpy = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-python3 = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" +# Revert RPM to using internally supported values +SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-rpm = "${lcl_maybe_fortify} -fstack-protector" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-syslinux = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-tcl = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-tiff = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"